Skip to main content
Table of Contents

Role Based Path - VP of Engineering

This guide is for VPs of Engineering who need an org-level view of delivery health, reliability signals, and investment priorities. It shows where to spend time in LinearB to improve predictability a…

heather.hazell
Updated by heather.hazell

This guide is for VPs of Engineering who need an org-level view of delivery health, reliability signals, and investment priorities. It shows where to spend time in LinearB to improve predictability across teams, scale best practices with gitStream, and use AI-assisted insights (if enabled) to speed up leadership narratives — without turning metrics into a performance scorecard.

Time Required: 10–15 minutes to orient, 30 minutes to establish an exec cadence
Difficulty: Easy

TL;DR

  • Use Metrics → Delivery to monitor org-level flow, stage bottlenecks, and variance.
  • Use Teams → Iterations (Completed) to assess planning stability, carryover, and unplanned work patterns.
  • Use Developer Coaching and Surveys (if enabled) to surface workload, knowledge, and sentiment risks that affect execution.
  • Scale low-noise standards with gitStream to improve PR hygiene and reduce review friction at the org level.
  • Use AI Insights (if enabled) to accelerate system-level narratives and prioritize where to invest.

Overview

At the VP level, your goal is consistent outcomes across many teams: faster flow, higher predictability, and healthier systems. LinearB helps you connect real Git activity with planning data so your leadership discussions focus on the system, not individual performance.

This guide helps you:

  • Understand where delivery is trending up or down across your org.
  • Identify which constraints are systemic vs. team-specific.
  • Prioritize investments in DevEx, Platform, or enablement with evidence.
  • Create repeatable leadership narratives for quarterly planning and exec reviews.

What you likely care about

  • Which parts of the delivery system are the biggest constraints right now?
  • Where is variability highest across teams?
  • Is unplanned work consistently eroding capacity?
  • Are knowledge or workload risks putting delivery at risk?
  • What standards can we scale without adding process overhead?

Where to spend time in LinearB

Metrics → Delivery

Your primary exec-level flow and variance view.

  • Compare teams to identify outliers and high-variance patterns.
  • Look for repeated slowdowns in a single stage across multiple teams.
Teams → Iterations (Completed)

Your planning health and scope stability view.

  • Review planned vs. unplanned trends and carryover patterns by team.
  • Use this to guide capacity, intake, and roadmap risk conversations.
  • If AI Iteration Summary is enabled, use it to standardize leadership-ready retros.
Developer Coaching (if enabled)

Helps surface organization-level patterns in workload strain and knowledge concentration that may become delivery risk.

Surveys (if enabled)

Adds structured DevEx and AI adoption sentiment to your delivery narrative.

gitStream (if enabled)

Your scale lever for low-noise engineering standards.

  • Use org-level rules to reduce review friction and improve PR clarity.
  • Measure impact through trend shifts in Delivery and Iterations.
AI Insights (if enabled)

Use AI to accelerate system-level pattern detection and generate concise executive narratives. Validate recommendations with underlying team data.

Investment, allocation & cost capitalization (if enabled)

At the org level, speed is only part of the story. You also need a defensible view of where engineering effort is going and whether it matches strategy.

  • Resource Allocation uses FTE to break down effort across projects, epics, initiatives, issue types, and other configured work units (Jira and Azure). Use it to validate whether actual investment matches your planned priorities.
  • Investment Strategy adds a category-level view of how development effort is distributed so you can track strategic balance over time.
  • Cost Capitalization (available by request for Enterprise Plan customers) helps reduce manual finance reporting by categorizing capitalizable vs. non-capitalizable work by your reporting structure.

Review these trends monthly and before quarterly planning.

Start here in 15 minutes

VP quick-start checklist
  1. Open Metrics → Delivery with a consistent timeframe (for example, last 30–90 days).
  2. Identify:
    • top 2–3 slowest or most variable stages
    • teams with the largest trend drift
  3. Open Iterations (Completed) for those teams to check:
    • unplanned work patterns
    • carryover consistency
    • unlinked work signals
  4. If enabled, confirm whether Coaching or Survey signals align with the same risk themes.
  5. Pick one org-level improvement theme to sponsor this cycle.

A small exec metrics set to align on

  • Cycle Time with stage breakdowns.
  • Planning Accuracy / Capacity Accuracy (Scrum) or Throughput (Kanban).
  • Unplanned work trends in Iterations.
  • PR Size trends where relevant.
  • Reliability/quality signals where your incident setup supports them.

Recommended Exec operating rhythm

Weekly
  • Scan Delivery for new outliers and trend shifts.
  • Ask Directors for one concise narrative per focus area:
    • What changed?
    • What’s the likely systemic cause?
    • What small experiment are we running next?
Monthly
  • Review Iterations (Retro) summaries for planning stability and scope health.
  • Decide whether the best lever is enablement, platform, staffing, or policy.
Quarterly
  • Use trend evidence to justify DevEx/Platform investments.
  • Standardize 1–2 org-wide practices with gitStream.

Common pitfalls

  • Over-indexing on single-team anomalies instead of org-level trends.
  • Too many KPIs rather than a small, action-linked set.
  • Using metrics for performance scoring instead of system improvement.
  • Scaling standards without context when a measured opt-out is appropriate.

How did we do?

Role Based Path - Tech Lead & Developer

Contact